THE HOLOCAUST MASSACRE IN DUBROVYTSIA – AUGUST 1942

THE HOLOCAUST MASSACRE IN DUBROVYTSIA – AUGUST 1942

Guest Author: Minna Rozen

Dobrovytsia (Dombrovitsa) is a city in Rivne Oblast, Ukraine.

Abstract: In August 1942, the Jews of Dombrovitsa, Ukraine, including Minna Rozen’s family, were massacred by the Nazis and local collaborators. In 2006, Rozen visited the area, retracing her family’s tragic history with relatives. Her journey highlighted the haunting memories and the struggle to acknowledge the past, ultimately fostering a sense of connection to her heritage.

This document was originally written by Minna Rozen. Professor Rozen is a historian whose past affiliations include Tel Aviv University, Haifa University, and Princeton University. The paper is originally written in Hebrew.  A translation into Ukrainian language is forthcoming.

On August 26 and 27, 1942, my grandmother, Mindel Vorona (née Dubelstein), and my uncle, Yechezkel Vorona, were murdered along with the rest of the Jews of their town, Dobrovytsia, and the surrounding towns in the Sarny Forest by the Germans and their Ukrainian collaborators. My grandfather, Avraham Chaim Vorona, was murdered two days earlier by his Ukrainian neighbor while attempting to rescue his family from the ghetto. In 2006, I traveled with my brother Menachem and my first-, second-, and third-cousins on a journey in the footsteps of our forefathers to Boromel, Lutsk, and Dombrovitsa. Even my eternal husband, Avinoam, agreed to come with me, even though he hates traveling and has no connection whatsoever to Volhynia, its rivers, and its swamps. He has his own rivers, in Transylvania. I kept a travel journal, and I’m sharing with you the fifth day of our journey in memory of those who were murdered.

Day Five (August 15, 2006)

For me, the fifth day of our journey was the hardest. The testimonies I had gathered about the massacre in Serny had kept me awake for much of the summer, and the thought of physically walking through those very sites filled me with dread. To my surprise, the entire group—none of whom had any connection to my mother or her family—announced that they were coming with me, including Avinoam, of course, and Menachem, whom I thought wouldn’t want to come.

Avinoam told me he was curious to see where my mother came from. Menachem said he owed her this trip. I think the others sensed my distress and wanted to support me, and I was deeply grateful to them. Ida Kaczka, the last Jewish woman in Serny, said she would gladly take us to the massacre site in Serny. Since we had no contacts in Dombrovica, I decided to ask her to accompany us there as well, and I hoped she would agree. Although, strictly speaking, we were supposed to stop first in Dombrovitsa and then in Serny, that wasn’t the case, because Serny is south of Dombrovitsa, whereas Dombrovitsa is right on the border with Belarus and not far from the Polish border. And so we arrived first in Serny.

Israel-Sasha, our guide, had arranged to meet Ida at the central bus station in Serny. “How will we recognize her?” I asked Sasha. “We’ll recognize her, we’ll recognize her,” Israel replied with endless patience. When we arrived at the bus station in Serny, I was full of doubts. “How will we recognize her?” When we pulled up in the van, a plump, middle-aged woman hurried toward us—it was undoubtedly Ida Katchka. How did she recognize us? I have no idea, but the recognition was mutual and immediate. Israel-Sasha smiled at me with a look of triumph. “I told you there wouldn’t be any problem!” his eyes said. Ida led us to some café, which, according to her, was “the best in town.” Serny was the regional capital in every sense of the word, but it looked pretty much like Beit She’an (my apologies to the people of Beit She’an). We went to the restroom and ordered coffee, and Ida told us her life story in a mix of broken Yiddish and Russian that Sasha translated. Ida told us that her parents and grandparents were from Dombrovitsa. Her mother had hidden with a Ukrainian family and was thus saved. After the war, she married a Jewish man. It wasn’t clear to me whether Ida herself was married to a Jew, since she didn’t mention it. She told us that, in fact, she had never actually been to Dombrovitsa (a 20-minute drive from Serny…), and that she would be happy to come with us. According to her, there are about twenty Jews in Serni, none of whom are recognized by the Orthodox Rabbinate. She herself is active in all aspects of “community” life, and she sent her daughter to Israel. “What do you have to do here?” I asked her, and she replied with utter seriousness: “If I’m not here, who will take you to the graves?” In a sense, she viewed her stay in Serni the same way the last Jew in Radzivillov had viewed his stay there. Ida was a cheerful, laughing woman who radiated positive energy. She led Nikolai down all sorts of winding paths and eventually drove the van into a field of thorns, until it seemed to me she was going to lead us all to our doom. But finally, she ordered him to stop, and we got out of the van. “From here we’ll walk,” she ordered. To our left were railroad tracks, and next to them a small shed. “We have to walk about two kilometers along the tracks, and that’s where the massacre site is,” Ida said. A shudder and a chill ran down my spine. After all, Grandmother Mindel and Uncle Yechezkel must have gotten off right at this spot from the train that carried the 2,000 Jews of Dombrovica who remained after the escape on the eve of the massacre, and during the march toward the train station beyond Horin.

We began walking among the thorns beside the tracks, and from there we descended onto the path leading into the forest. The forest floor was sandy, hinting that long ago, before humans existed, there had been a sea here. Gradually, I realized that Menachem was lagging behind; the further we went—and we weren’t walking fast—the more slowly he trudged, as if lead weights were attached to his feet. I couldn’t decide why he was lagging behind—perhaps because he was tired, or perhaps because his freezing heart was sending icy currents to his legs, which refused to carry him. I, too, felt those icy currents, but my legs carried me as if they were wings toward the site of the massacre, as if a great mystery—one I had been striving to unravel for many days—would be solved there. And so the distance between us grew, and he drifted further and further away from me.

After walking for about an hour, we reached the site of the first memorial. There were three memorials there. I do not know for certain what they signify. Were they erected over the mass graves, or perhaps over the barracks where the unfortunate women and children were burned alive? It hardly matters. This entire vast forest was one huge slaughterhouse for fourteen thousand men, women, boys, and girls.

The inscription on the memorial reads:

“In memory of the Jews of Serny, Rokitna, Dombrovica, and the surrounding area who were tortured and murdered by the Nazis and their accomplices, may their names be blotted out, on the 13th–14th of Elul, 5702

(August 26–27, 1942). May their memory be a blessing. Erected in 2002.”

The area around the memorial is enclosed by a low concrete fence, which may symbolize the site of the mass grave, but we cannot know for certain. I leaned against the concrete fence and read to my cousins, my brother, and my husband the letter of lament that the unfortunate Yitzhak Gealer wrote to his brother in Holon from a displaced persons camp in Germany in 1946. How he and his friends had sought to set the town of Sarny ablaze so that they might die alongside the Philistines, and how they were forbidden from doing so by the head of the Judenrat. How all the Jews from the surrounding area were gathered in the fenced-off area in the forest; how most of the women and children were held in three barracks for two days in the scorching August heat without food or water; how, when the slaughter began, he and his friends broke through the fence and fled; how he hid nearby and watched as the small children who had not been taken into the barracks were torn to pieces—some by hand grenades, others literally by the hands of the evildoers—and how the barracks were set ablaze with their occupants inside. Yitzhak Geeller left his wife and three young daughters there. All he had left was the need to tell the story of his city’s destruction.

I wasn’t sure that was what I should do, but I felt a strong need to make everyone else understand what had happened there—to understand that it wasn’t just death. It was a strange kind of death that only human beings are capable of inventing. I thought they would be angry with me. They were horrified and might have preferred that I not tell them everything that had happened. Everyone walked back in complete silence. Menachem walked beside me and grumbled, “I’m angry with you. You cause me grief and anguish all the time. I don’t want you to cause me grief and anguish.” I told him he was lucky he could walk back the same way he’d come. He remained silent, sulking. We got into the van where Nikolai was waiting for us and drove north toward Dombrovitsa. However, before reaching Dombrovitsa, we passed through all those little villages from which my grandmother Mindel, my mother’s cousin Yosef Koyfman, and other family members whose memory has been lost had come. The first town where we stopped was Barzenitsa.

We had to stop there. If I knew nothing about my mother’s family, I knew even less—if anything at all—about my grandmother’s family. The fact that she was born in Bereznitsa came to my attention by chance from the census book compiled by the Ukrainians in Dombrovitsa at the Nazis’ request in the summer of 1942. The rest of the delegation members felt that stopping in Bereznitsa was a complete waste of time, and they remained in the van for the time being. Outside, a persistent rain was falling. Nikolai, the driver, pulled over at the edge of a grassy square with a charming light-blue church at its center. On the far side of the grassy square, I could see wooden houses, just as charming, painted in vibrant colors. The whole place looked like a set from the movie *Fiddler on the Roof*. I walked toward the row of houses across the square. On the way, I noticed that it wasn’t actually a lawn at all, but simply overgrown with wild grass. Reddish-brown chickens were grazing there, and even some whitish geese waddled along the muddy path. The path I was walking on was simply compacted earth. Where the rainwater hadn’t been absorbed into the ground, there were shallow puddles. Avinoam shuffled along behind me, and Israel—Sasha—shuffled after him.

At the beginning of Mud Street stood a wooden house painted green and a vivid golden yellow. An elderly woman peered out the window, curiously observing the strangers who had arrived. Within a few minutes, the elderly woman stepped outside, beyond the fence of her house. Meanwhile, all the members of the “delegation” had gotten out of the van and gathered around us. The woman, who had a pleasant and calm demeanor, looked to be about two hundred years old, but during the conversation it turned out she was only 76. In other words, in 1942 she was 12 years old. I asked her about the Dubelstein family. She didn’t know them. But she mentioned other families and calmly told us that the entire village had been populated by Jews. There was an important Hasidic rabbi here, she noted to us, whom everyone came to greet. She herself was one of the few Ukrainians living in the village, and she worked at a Jewish hotel that was located there. Not a word was said about the massacre or the circumstances under which the Jews “disappeared.” I couldn’t stop thinking about the diabolical soccer game that took place on the road between Braznitsa and Serny, in which the babies of the people of Braznitsa were used as soccer balls by the Ukrainian police officers who escorted them to their deaths. I took photos of the dusty path and some of the houses, and we decided to move on. The elderly woman—who had been joined by a few more people in the meantime—pointed out that at the entrance to the village we could see the village synagogue, or what remained of it. She thanked Jesus the Savior for granting her such a delightful conversation with such good people, and we all returned to the van and drove on. At the entrance to the village, there really was a building that matched her description. Nikolai stopped, and I, Avinoam, Menachem, and Sasha walked over there. The place was locked with a padlock and a bolt, and it didn’t appear to be in use at all. The building looked relatively new, as if it had been built just before the war. Avinoam, who isn’t afraid of anything, tried to pick the lock, and to my delight, found a way to peek through the windows into the interior of the building. Its roof was about to collapse, and it was devoid of any sign that it had ever been a synagogue. We returned to the van, and this time we bid farewell to Brzenica. “Where to now?” asked the patient Nikolai. “Now to Dombrovica, but on the way we’ll make a quick stop in Bresta,” I replied. “What do we have to do in Bresta?” Menachem asked. “Bresta is the village where the Koyfmans lived,” I explained to him, “and I promised Zelda and Gensia that we’d stop there.” At that point, everyone realized there was no point in arguing with me. They waited for us to reach Dombrovitsa, where they could settle into a restaurant and let me chase after my ghosts. According to Zelda and Gensia’s descriptions, which were based on their father’s account, Bresta was a tiny village where only a handful of Jewish families lived. It was much smaller than Dombrovica, and even than Bereznica. At the entrance to the village, we passed a vast green meadow, at the far end of which stood a hay-laden wagon drawn by two healthy-looking horses. When we entered the village, a surprise awaited me. The village looked much larger than Bereznitsa and much more modern. There were wooden houses here as well, but most of them were new wooden houses built in the old style. Not all the streets were muddy; some were paved, and the whole place looked a little more “modern.” Something had changed in Bresta since the time when little Yosef Koyfman would walk there every morning from Bresta to Dumbrovitsa to study Torah in the large town’s cheder. I photographed some of the old houses, some of the new ones, and one muddy alley, and there was nothing left to do but continue on to Dombrovitsa, which was just a few kilometers away. Nikolai led us to the town center and went into the town hall with Yisrael-Sasha to ask where they could find information about the local Jewish community. They directed us to the municipal museum. So we drove to the municipal museum. On the way, we saw that the town was remarkably well-kept. All the houses were painted in vibrant colors. The town center boasted a square and neat, well-tended flower beds. The whole place looked as if it were awaiting the visit of an important guest. “Me?” I thought to myself. I recalled what Tarabilo had told me—that in honor of Dombrovitsa’s 1,000th anniversary, it had undergone a “facelift.”

Menachem was agitated and restless. It was raining outside. The others were hungry, but didn’t dare say a word. Menachem grumbled, “You’re crazy. This won’t end well. They’ve probably sent the police after us by now. ” Why would they send the police after us? I asked myself silently. Does he really believe they’re afraid I’ll claim rights to my grandfather’s house, or that I’ll accuse someone of his murder? Yes, it’s true he was murdered by his neighbor across the street, but what good would it do me to know who it was and where it happened? The murderer is surely dead by now. But I knew that Menachem was trapped in the tangle of horrors that had been hidden from us all our lives, and now he imagined that they had a life of their own and would come after him to demand the pound of flesh he owed them as the son of his mother and the grandson of Avraham Chaim Verona. We arrived at the museum. It was a small building, apparently a wooden house (belonging to Jews, no doubt) that had been renovated and converted into a museum, presumably in honor of the celebrations marking the millennium of Dombrovitsa’s existence. We wiped our feet on the mat at the entrance and went inside. We were greeted by a young, slender woman in her mid-thirties—blue-eyed, with blonde hair and a perfectly straight fringe—the museum director. She herself was born in Lviv, where she had graduated from university. She proudly showed us around the place. The display cases contained knife blades, axes, and other tools made of stone from the Dark Age—fifteen thousand years ago, or perhaps even longer. There were also cases containing textiles, household items, and photographs of the homes and families of good Ukrainian peasants. The entire museum was tiny, clean, and remarkably well-organized. The word “Jews” was not mentioned even once. I asked Israel—Sasha—to ask her if this could be possible, since from the time the town was founded, most of its residents had been Jewish—that is, until August 1942. He asked, and she blushed and apologized, saying that the museum had only just been founded and they had no material on the Jews, but she would be happy to include it if we sent her such material. The truth is, the young woman admitted, since she was a native of Lviv, she herself was now studying the history of the place. She was full of goodwill and eager to help, and volunteered to show us around the town. “What would you like to see?” she asked. I told her I wanted to see the old market square, the Plianet, the hospital, the bridge over the Horin, and a few streets along which I thought I might be able to identify my grandfather Avraham Chaim’s house. The young woman from the museum didn’t quite listen to my explanation and led us to the various places to the best of her understanding. She led us to a charmless square with a dull, blue-painted building. “This is where the old market used to be,” she explained. The entire area was destroyed during the war, and now the district administration complex stands on that site. So, the entire old Jewish center has vanished and is no more. Later, we found ourselves standing in front of a large, overgrown lot, fenced off right up to the sidewalk, with a sad-looking, single-story building in the center that resembled a school. “This is part of the Pliant,” the young woman explained.

“What does the word ‘Pliant’ mean?” I asked. The young woman, with the help of Sasha-Israel, explained that it was a resort area along the Horin River, stretching from the home of the Polish nobles to the Plater House and on to the Polish church. “It doesn’t look like a resort area,” I said.

The museum guide explained that this was the rear part of the Pliant, and that various public buildings had been constructed on part of it. “What are we doing here?” Menachem grumbled. I explained to him that the Pliant was the burial site for the Jews who had fled the convoy that set out on August 26 for the train station beyond the Horin River, as well as for the Jews who were later captured in the fields, in the forests, in the courtyards of Ukrainians, and all the partisans who were captured in the area. In fact, it is highly likely that my grandfather, Avraham Chaim, is buried in Pliant; he was shot by his Ukrainian neighbor on the evening of August 25, 1942, as he tried to escape from his yard toward Blatnische Street, which was outside the ghetto. Menachem remained silent. We returned to the van. On the way, the young woman from the museum explained to us that she knew many Ukrainian families who had hidden Jews during the war. The entire village had indeed been a Jewish village, but when the Plater family—a Polish noble family—arrived here, they forced the Jews out of their livelihoods. I seethed with anger, but I chose to remain silent, since the young woman from the museum’s services were important, and her sense of guilt made her eager to please. When we got off the van, we found ourselves in front of a large, dilapidated-looking church. “That’s the Polish church,” the young woman explained. That explained its shabbiness.

Catholicism had been the religion of the Polish oppressors. Now that they were gone, their church stood shabby, desolate, on the verge of collapse, and would soon vanish, just as the remnants of Jewish life in that place had vanished. Beside the church were wide steps leading down, down. At first I didn’t understand where we were going, but suddenly the dense foliage through which we had been descending parted, and we found ourselves standing before a rope bridge spanning the Horin River. The sight that unfolded before us was breathtaking. The river was beautiful, flanked by lush vegetation, and if you looked down its length, it seemed as though you were in a primeval European forest—“Dubravi”—lush groves with broad-leaved oak and willow trees lining the riverbanks (The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, p. 261). It seemed as if the first Polish and Jewish settlers were about to arrive to clear the land and build the first houses in Dombrovitsa. The rain continued to fall.

And Mother didn’t tell me a thing about all this beauty. Dumbrůvice was probably founded at the beginning of the second millennium, likely by the Viking Normans, who established settlements at every point that served as a hub in their river transport network. River transport was the means by which they moved quickly from place to place, raiding the local Slavic inhabitants and establishing centers of control. The Slavs themselves arrived in Ukraine from the east no earlier than the sixth century and conquered it from local tribes. At the end of the tenth century, the region’s inhabitants adopted Orthodox Christianity. The princes of the Norman Rurik dynasty ruled from their seat in Kyiv for some 250 years, until the Mongols swept through Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Asia Minor, and the Near East. In *The History of the Orthodox Churches in the Vicinity of Volhynia*, published over 100 years ago, it is written: “With the invasion of the Tatars and their conquest of the city, they forced all the local residents to lie prostrate on the ground, covered them with planks, and sat upon them to celebrate their victory at set tables: thus the entire local population was suffocated” (The Book of Dombrovitsa, p. 22, note *). Well, there is nothing new under the sun. The Mongols did not establish stable rule in Ukraine but contented themselves with instilling fear to ensure the regular collection of taxes. Dombrovitsa became part of the Principality of Galicia, which stretched from Galitz in the south to Pripyat in the north. Just to clarify for the reader, the Pripyat is a tributary of the Dniester into which the legendary Styr—the river of the city of Lutsk—flows, as does the Horin. Later, the region came under the rule of the

Princes of Volhynia, whose capital was Lutsk. In 1330, the Lithuanians conquered the region, and Dombrovitsa, like Lutsk, became part of the Pinsk Province. The authors of the book *Dombrovitsa* believe that Jewish settlement in the area began no earlier than the fifteenth century, under Lithuanian rule; however, we have no written sources to confirm this one way or the other. It stands to reason that as early as the fourteenth century, when Poland and Lithuania united (1386), Jews were already present in the town. It was a small community that could not stand on its own. In 1623, they constituted an administrative unit of the Pinsk community. In 1648, they were massacred alongside the Poles and Lithuanians by the Don Cossacks under the leadership of Bohdan Khmelnytsky, the leader of the Ukrainian uprising against the Poles who ruled the land. But immediately after the uprising was suppressed, the Jewish community in the town was reestablished. In 1766, there were 404 Jews in the town. A few years earlier, in 1753, Dombrovitsa became an independent community with the following rights: its members were permitted to litigate in the rabbinical court, and they were allowed to use wood for heating and construction. They could acquire vacant lots for construction in exchange for paying certain taxes. Plots for public buildings such as a synagogue, a bathhouse, the rabbi’s residence, and the cemetery were exempt from taxes. Jews were permitted to establish a distillery for distilled spirits, trade in wine, slaughter cattle, and sell non-kosher meat to Christians; however, for this privilege, they paid a tax of 200 gold coins per year. Jews were exempt from the obligation to perform court service. All these rights were confirmed in 1774 by Antoni Plater, who held the position of royal governor of the city and its environs by royal decree. In 1793, Volhynia was annexed by Russia. The Russians recognized his rights and even granted him the title of count. That same year, Volhynia was declared part of the settlement area, where Jews were permitted to live and move about freely, and the Jewish population of Dombrovitsa grew rapidly.

During World War I, the town changed hands repeatedly between the Russians, the Germans, and Ukrainian nationalists; however, at the end of the war, it became part of the new Polish state. By the eve of World War II, the town had a population of about 5,000, of whom 4,500 were Jews; Ukrainian farmers lived on their farms around the town. Dumbrówica in the eighteenth century was certainly a place where open land outnumbered built-up areas; this can be inferred from the fact that any Jew could build a house on vacant land for a modest tax. One can imagine just how remote, desolate, and in need of settlement the place was in the fourteenth century, when the first Jewish settlers arrived there.

We stood in awe in the pouring rain on the rope bridge, gazing at the wild beauty of the place. There is no doubt that this is a new bridge built in honor of the Millennium celebrations; it is not at all clear to me whether it spans the site of the old bridge, and I was also unable to reach the famous train station.

We descended from the bridge and climbed back up the stairs leading to the Polish church. The young woman from the museum took us a few blocks away to a small, empty lot between the houses and solemnly announced that this was the old cemetery. She declared, with no less solemnity, that no one dares to build on this lot, lest the spirits of the dead haunt them.

I tried to get her to take us to the intersection of “Beltnische Gasse” and “Dukarovke Gasse”—that is, the street leading to the Dukarov Forest, where the ghetto border was, and where Grandfather Avraham Chaim’s house had stood. She led us to a street corner, and there we began an in-depth discussion about whether the street names had changed. I didn’t see a hospital at all. While we were still debating, a babushka came toward us, a cane in her hand; for a moment, I imagined her taking off into the sky on it.

The young woman from the museum began questioning her. She didn’t remember any Verona, but she did remember other families (they always remember houses you aren’t looking for). While we were still questioning the babushka and consulting the map in the Dombrovica book, Elisha scolded me, saying this wasn’t the right way to go about it, because I didn’t know if the street names had changed, and two women about my age approached us and asked what we were looking for. Israel explained the situation to them. One of them said she was a native of the town, as were her parents and grandparents, and that she would help us search. Israel gathered from this that she knew where the grandfather lived. Besides that, she said there was one other Jewish woman in town, also a native of the town, and she would surely know. The kind woman who volunteered to help us said she had to stop by her house because she’d left food on the stove, and she’d meet us at the agreed-upon spot. She went on her way, and we rode in the van to the meeting place. The people in the back were starting to get annoyed. It was around four in the afternoon, and we hadn’t eaten anything since morning. For some reason, I didn’t feel hungry at all. We rode with the second woman, the young lady from the museum, and Mrs. Katchka. It was starting to get a bit crowded in the van. Suddenly, another babushka who had heard about our arrival stopped us and expressed her desire to help. Israel let her into the van as well. Nikolai burst into hysterical laughter and gave a long speech in Russian that everyone understood except me, even though no one except Israel and the locals spoke Russian. It turned out that Nikolai had said: “I’m hungry. Why don’t we gather all the babushkas, hold a babushka convention, have them hold a referendum on where Grandpa lives, and get this over with?” The whole van roared with laughter. For some reason, I didn’t find it funny. We arrived at the meeting place together with the friendly woman. She suggested we go to the new cemetery first. The young woman from the museum was shocked: “ “Is there another Jewish cemetery here?” she asked. “You bet,” replied the local woman, and most of the headstones are still in place. She led Nikolai along a path through the fields that formed the western border of the city; on one side were sparsely built houses, and on the other

wide fields, beyond which stretched a green, dense forest in the distance. As we drove along this road, I did not yet realize that this was part of the Dukarov Road, and that the forest visible in the distance was the Dukarov Forest. The fields stretching westward from us were the very fields through which those fleeing the massacre had tried to reach the forest. These were the fields about which Fogelstein wrote: “The vast fields of Dombrovica were black with people—Jews fleeing to the forest from the oppressor.” Only fifty of them survived.

The “new” cemetery was large and full of headstones. Avinoam and Nikolai began digging with their hands, and so I photographed some of them. I felt terrible. I had photographed 60,000 Jewish headstones in Turkey, and here I was leaving the headstones of my ancestors behind, and soon no one would even know they had been here. I asked myself how the headstones had survived, and I remembered that after the war, the locals wanted to plow the field, and Yehoshua Fishman and a few other survivors went to city hall and announced that if the Jewish cemetery were plowed over, they promised to plow over the Christian cemetery. At that particular moment in Ukraine’s history, Fishman could have done so. He now belonged to the victorious Communist establishment, and the Ukrainians were identified with the vanquished. Nevertheless, I find it interesting that the attempt was not repeated. I saw no hate graffiti anywhere. It seemed that the new Dombrovitsians had resolved to forget the very existence of the old Dombrovitsians and to make no further mention of them in any way or by any means. After visiting the cemetery, I felt that if we didn’t eat something, a revolt would break out. The kind woman and her friend went on their way, saying that in the meantime they would call a Jewish woman living in the village to arrange a meeting, and we would meet up with them later. We let a young woman from the museum take us to a restaurant in town. Before that, we all felt an urgent need to use the restroom (it was already 5:00 p.m.!) The museum director said she would take us to the photo shop where she had the pictures of the town she wanted to give us taken. Of course, the photos weren’t ready yet, and the shop was closed. She looked embarrassed, and finally said shyly that all she had to offer were the standard Dombrovitsa restrooms, which are “à la turca”—outdoors, meaning without running water. It was a particularly unpleasant experience, but when you have to, you have no choice.

The restaurant owner warned us that there was no water in Dombrovitsa due to some unclear malfunction, so the menu she could offer was limited. It was indeed limited but included the usual borscht, stuffed cabbage, and latkes. The cousins ate in silence. Kachka, Nikolai, and the young woman from the museum sat separately and chattered away in Ukrainian. At the end of the meal, the friendly local woman joined us. It turned out that the only Jewish woman in town didn’t want to meet us at all. I wasn’t surprised. Not everyone wants to be reminded of their otherness, especially when it comes to a survivor of the massacre. We returned to the intersection of Dukarovke and Blatnische, and the local woman explained to us where the hospital had been and where the ghetto boundary had been. That was the moment I realized that the landscape we were seeing to the west—the same one we’d seen at the new cemetery—was the expanse of fields through which the survivors had fled the massacre. A shiver ran through me. The local woman consulted with another babushka she met on the street, amid Nikolai’s roars of laughter.

Based on her explanation and the map, we identified a house on the corner that matched the description of Grandfather Avraham Chaim’s escape, but the house seemed too big. I suggested the possibility that the house had been built after the war, but it looked quite old.

Israel—Sasha—said he had a solution. He went into the house across the street and asked around. A dark dread came over me. If this was my grandfather’s house, then it was from the house across the street that they had shot at him to kill him. I didn’t have time to say that; instead, I stammered that I wasn’t willing to go in there under any circumstances, but Israel, who didn’t understand why, pushed me inside. It was a wooden house with a small entryway, from which we entered the main room. The wooden ceiling was very low. The walls were covered with rugs. On one side stood a bed, the kind from the Jewish Agency, covered with a white embroidered bedspread. Icons hung on the walls, and a wood-burning tin stove stood against the opposite wall. The floor was bare wood, and most of the room was taken up by a round table covered with an embroidered tablecloth. An elderly, toothless woman sat on the bed, and on one of the chairs next to the table sat a younger woman dressed in black, who was also missing a few teeth. The younger woman was younger than me but looked much older than her age. A heavy smell of urine hung in the air (there was no water in Dombrovitsa that day!).

The old woman said she had grown up in this house. She remembered the neighbors—so-and-so and such-and-such—but no Mindel or Verona. What did you expect her to say—that she was the daughter of a murderer? I tugged at Yisrael’s sleeve and hurried outside. I felt it was time to leave. We gave $50 to the local woman who had accompanied us. She protested, but we told her it was for gifts for her grandchildren, and that made sense to her. Before we left, we stopped by the museum. I wrote something in the museum guestbook in Hebrew about the demons running wild inside me and my wish to calm them down, and about the kind women I’d met in Dombrovitsa. I don’t know why, but I slipped $50 into the museum director’s hands. She spent the whole day with us and went out of her way to help, but she didn’t want to take any money for herself. I told her it was for the museum; she protested but finally took the money. On second thought, I felt bad about it. This museum has erased the traces of the Jews of Dombrovitsa—why should I give them money? Why? I suppose by doing so I was demonstrating my superiority over them and their museum. You murdered my family, erased any trace of their existence, and yet there’s no doubt that my fate is better than yours. I hope that blonde young woman took the money for herself and put it to good use.

We drove to Serny in silence. Only Ida Kachka, Israel, and Nikolai chatted cheerfully. By the time we reached Serny, it was almost dark. It was hard for Ida Kachka to say goodbye to us. She laughed and said, “I already thought we’d become a family. It’s hard to part.” We also gave Ida $50 “for the grandchildren” and continued on to Lutsk. The road seemed unbelievably long. We arrived in Lutsk very late and collapsed from exhaustion. Unbelievably, I didn’t have a single nightmare. No Ukrainians and no Germans chased after me, and no one threatened the safety of my beloved grandchildren.

A stone wall featuring graffiti, including a swastika symbol and the phrase 'HEIL HITLER' written in red paint.

Contemporsry NAZI graffiti in the streets of Lutzk, Volhynia. August 2006. Photo: M. Lender.

And that’s the end of the story. Nothing remains as it was. About two years ago, on the initiative of the descendants of the survivors from Dombrovitsa—and primarily through the efforts of the local Lechovich family—a memorial to the town’s Jews was erected. The Lechovich family maintains and cares for the memorial.

A granite memorial stone featuring Hebrew and Russian inscriptions, commemorating Jewish victims from a specific historical event. Surrounded by greenery in a natural setting.

Memorial monument in Serny, erected 2002.

In the photos: The delegation to Ukraine. A photo of the village of Dombrovitsa taken from the old cemetery. The Horin River. Consulting with elderly women from the village to determine where things were. The path to the killing valley. The memorial stone in the killing valley. A photograph of the memorial erected in the town at the initiative of the Lechovich family and the descendants of the town’s survivors, and a painting of mine in which I tried to conjure up.

A rural landscape featuring clouds overhead, with two distinct religious buildings in the background, surrounded by scattered houses and greenery.

A photo of the village of Dombrovitsa taken from the old cemetery. The Horin River.

A painting of a woman in a dark dress with red accents, sitting outdoors against a backdrop of stormy skies and traditional buildings.

Mindel Vorona. Artistic painting by Minna Rozen

Grandma Mindel based on a single photograph of her against a backdrop of photos of her village.

(One of the few paintings I’ve done in oil rather than acrylic. 2006.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minna_Rozen https://www.mandylender.net https://minnarozen.co.il/

Posted in HOLOCAUST, politics, Travel, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Did Senator Lindsey Graham Die of a “Natural Cause”?

Do things just happen? Did Senator Lindsey Graham Die of a “Natural Cause”?

The claims regarding the death of Senator Lindsey Graham stem from a series of posts made by right-wing political activist Laura Loomer on the social media platform X.

Following an announcement from Senator Graham’s office that he passed away after a “brief and sudden illness,” Loomer publicly questioned the official cause of death, suggesting a foreign assassination plot.

Portrait of a smiling man in a black suit and a blue and white striped tie, standing in front of an American flag.

The Alleged Story & Claims

Senator Graham was a 71 years old man.  Graham died after a “brief and sudden illness” on the evening of July 11, 2026, two days after his 71st birthday.  One of Graham’s Senate staffers said there had been no indication that he was ill before his death.


Loomer argued that the timing of Graham’s death “doesn’t feel like coincidence” and called for an official investigation and a toxicology report, pointing to recent geopolitical events:

  • Recent Travel to Ukraine: Loomer noted that Senator Graham had just returned from a trip to Ukraine a day prior to his death. During the trip, he met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to advocate for increased U.S. support and a new package of Russian sanctions.
  • Threats from Russia: Loomer highlighted that Russian political philosopher and Putin advisor Alexander Dugin had publicly called for Graham to be “flattened” a few months earlier.
  • Threats from Iran: Loomer pointed out that at the funeral of late Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—which a Russian government delegation attended—operatives held signs displaying red targets over Graham’s face, alongside other prominent American figures.

Do things just happen?

Connecting these threads, Loomer questioned whether Graham had been poisoned by a foreign adversary either while traveling abroad or immediately upon his return to the United States. No evidence has been provided by officials to support these claims, and his office maintains he passed away from a sudden illness.

Posted in Business, politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PRACTICE GUERRILLA SERENDIPITY: SEIZE THE OPPOPRTUNITIES IN CHAOS

HACKING GUERRILLA SERENDIPITY IN A SHORT POST

Some folks are called “lucky”. Others call them fortunate. There is no luck.

But there is a habitual practice.  There exists whispered art, a secret handshake among the daring and the sagacious observants: Guerrilla Serendipity.  In 1961 I was in the Cave of the Treasure in Nahal Mishmar when the five millennia old chalcolithic treasure was uncovered.


The Unseen Handshake

Forget the dusty treatises on strategic planning. Forget the five-year forecast planners, and forget the meticulously crafted roadmaps to “guaranteed” success. Those are paths leading to outdated destinations.  

Guerrilla Serendipity isn’t about previous destination. It’s about the detour on the road to the unexpected vista; the invaluable discovery stumbled upon – the cheerfulness in the thicket of the fortuitous.

It’s the understanding that breakthroughs are always encountered. It’s the art of being ready for the fabulous gift of recognizing the opportunity not in its polished, unannounced form, but in its budding, often messy, disguise.


The Certainty of Serendipity

Serendipity encounters are a certainty. Serendipity encounters always exist!  Luck is erratic. Forget it.

Guerrilla Serendipity is a lifestyle of active pursuit of fortunate, joyful encounters. It’s the cultivation of an internal radar for resonating, and readiness to pivot when the universe winks.   The Guerrilla Serendipitors are the architects of happy encounters.

Think of Fleming the scientist who notices the mold contaminating a petri dish, not as a ruined experiment, but as a potential cure. Think of Pollock the artist who spills paint, not as a mistake, but as the genesis of a new technique. They weren’t seeking penicillin or a novel brushstroke. 

They were simply open, observing, and willing to deviate from the old script.

Remember the woman who went on a blind date, got proposed, married, and later won the house by inheriting the Las Vegas Sands Casino.


The Guerrilla’s Toolkit

So, how does one become a practitioner of this art of guerrilla serendipity?

  • Guerrilla means “Anything But Cash”.   G=ABC.  (Although money helps).
  • Cultivate Curiosity’s Edge: Ask “what if?” even when the answer seems obvious. Poke at the edge of your assumptions. The most fertile ground for serendipity lies just beyond the familiar. Expand your mind.
  • Embrace the Uncomfortable: Get out of the comfort zone.  Routine is the enemy of discovery. Step outside your usual favorite places of visit, engage with disparate ideas, cross-pollinate your thoughts with those who think differently. Adventurism is key. Be bold. Go out.

Go Rawdog. Go somewhere with no plans, no guidebook, and – this is the key ingredient – no companions, no itinerary.   My friend, Chuck Gillen and me rode the road to Palenque (Lacandón Jungle), rawdog; arriving with no planned lodging. 

A person standing on a trail surrounded by lush greenery in a forest.

Me, lost in the Lacandón jungle. Ca 1989.

I went to Alaska first time, I went rawdog alone, with one exception – I made a hotel reservation for first night upon arrival to Anchorage at midnight.

Aerial view of steep, rocky mountain terrain covered with snow, with a red outline from an aircraft's wing in the foreground.

Me, staring at the granite wall of Mt. McKinley AK. 2006.

  • Observe with Fresh Eyes: Be Sociable.  Meet with other people.  Shake hands first. Make friends. Don’t just look around.  Watch. Listen. Hear the undertones. Pay attention to the anomalies, the outliers, the things that don’t quite fit. These are often the breadcrumbs leading to unforeseen joyful serendipity encounters.
  • Maintain Mental Agility: Willingly drop your preconceived notions. The world rarely presents opportunities in a neat, pre-labeled package. Our mental Sagacity is key.  Recognize when a side observation holds more promise than the current trajectory.

Chaos is a friend – Go for it.

  • Connect the Scattered: The magic happens at the intersections. What seems unrelated today might be the missing piece of tomorrow’s puzzle. Hold onto diverse scraps of information; their true value may only reveal itself later.
  • Be shameless. Don’t feel constrained by other people’s opinions. Pursue what you wish.

The Unwritten Map

Guerrilla Serendipity is about knowing how to navigate resourcefully without a map and how to encounter treasures that aren’t marked.

Recognize that some of life’s most valuable discoveries are found by going off the beaten path, or by creating one. One unexpected step at a time. It’s the art of living with a heightened sense of infinite possibilities.  Welcome delightful intrusions, realize that the greatest adventures often begin with an unplanned turn.

Follow us for more tips on living the life of Guerrilla Serendipity fortunes.

SUBSCRIBE to this blog. It’s free.

www.mandylender.net  www.attractome.com   www.mandylender.com www.lendercombinations.com  www.visionofhabakkuk.com

Tags: #guerrillaserendipity #serendipity #adventurism #sagacity #socializing   #caveofthetreasure #Sandshotel #nahalmishmar #business #art #gambling #rawdog #serendipitome #Lacandonjungle

Posted in existentialism, Law of Attraction, Mandy Lender - Author, Mind - Body, serendipity, Travel, TRAVEL WRITING, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Evolution of the Chicago Democratic Machine: From Cermak to Johnson and Axelrod

Chicago’s political history is dominated by the Democratic Machine, characterized by patronage and ethnic coalitions. Key figures like Saul Alinsky challenged it with grassroots organizing, while the Machine adapted through leaders like Richard J. Daley. Recent shifts include the rise of union-backed politicians like Brandon Johnson, marking a transformation in urban governance.

The political history of Chicago is defined by a singular, enduring institution: the Democrat Machine. This system, a complex amalgam of ethnic coalition-building, ecclesiastical hierarchy, and clandestine alliances with organized crime, represented the most sophisticated form of urban governance in the twentieth-century United States.

To review the Machine is to examine a socio-political organism that prioritized stability and patronage over ideology, transforming a disparate collection of immigrant neighborhoods into a monolithic voting bloc that dictated the terms of local, state, and at times, national power. The Machine’s resilience was predicated on its ability to function as a secular church—a hierarchy of loyalty and obedience that rewarded the faithful with the “loaves and fishes” of municipal employment while excommunicating the dissenters through the denial of services and the slating of opposition candidates.

The Alinsky Challenge: The Radical Shadow of the Machine

The story of the Chicago Machine cannot be told without beginning with its most influential antagonist, Saul Alinsky. While the Machine sought to centralize power within the existing structures of City Hall, Alinsky pioneered a method of community organizing designed to empower the “Have-Nots” through confrontation and psychological warfare. Alinsky, often described as a provocateur-anarchist against the economic and political forces of discrimination, developed his tactical worldview in the same gutters where the Machine took root.

As a graduate student in criminology at the University of Chicago, Alinsky famously embedded himself with the Al Capone mob, observing how they “owned the city” and operated with a level of organizational efficiency that the official government often lacked. From these gangsters, he claimed to have learned the fundamental lesson of power: it is not given, but taken.

Alinsky’s philosophy, codified in his seminal work Rules for Radicals, (1971, still in print), emphasized that “tactics means doing what you can with what you have”. He viewed the Machine not as a democratic institution but as a technocratic establishment that needed to be upended through “political jujitsu”—using the organization’s own weight and rules to cause it to stumble.

One of his earliest and most successful maneuvers involved Mayor Edward J. Kelly. Alinsky tricked the mayor into publicly denouncing a group of pro-Machine priests, demonstrating a willingness to play outside the traditional lines of political decorum. When Kelly complained that Alinsky did not “fight like a liberal,” Alinsky famously replied, “No, I fight to win”.

Alinski was an anarchist.

The primary battleground for Alinsky’s struggle against the Machine was the Back of the Yards, a neighborhood made infamous by Upton Sinclair‘s The Jungle. Here, Alinsky and Joseph Meegan founded the Back of the Yards Neighborhood Council (BYNC) to break the pattern of outside direction and foster local democracy. Alinsky’s work through the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) eventually won him national notoriety as the “pet revolutionary of the church people of America,” a moniker given by William F. Buckley Jr.  Despite his tactical brilliance, Alinsky struggled to achieve a decisive electoral victory against the Machine at its apogee. In 1966, he attempted to defeat two Machine-backed congressmen on the South Side, hoping to give Black Chicagoans an unprecedented claim on power and diminish Richard J. Daley’s role as a national kingmaker. The attempt failed, as the Machine’s precinct captains successfully turned out the vote for the organization’s “hacks”.

The legacy of Alinsky, however, proved more durable than his immediate campaigns. His disciples and heirs, such as Fred Ross—who mentored Cesar Chavez—and later, a young community organizer named Barack Obama, carried forward the “Alinskyite” tradition of organizing the urban poor. By the twenty-first century, it was argued that Alinsky’s heirs had finally “finished the job” he started, as the traditional Machine politicians faced federal trials and a former labor organizer, Brandon Johnson, ascended to the mayoralty.

Comparative Framework: Alinskyite Organizing vs. Machine Patronage

FeatureSaul Alinsky’s ModelChicago Democratic Machine
Power SourceGrassroots “Have-Nots” and local councils.Patronage jobs and city contracts.
Organizational PhilosophyConflict and confrontation to force negotiation.Hierarchy, obedience, and communal loyalty.
Primary UnitThe Community Organization (e.g., BYNC, Woodlawn).The Ward Organization and Precinct Captain.
Relationship to ChurchUtilization of religious moral authority for protest.Modeling of structure after Catholic hierarchy.
Ultimate GoalDemocratic participation and self-determination.Electoral victory and maintenance of status quo.

The Birth of the Monolith: From Cermak to the Kelly-Nash Era

The Machine as a unified, citywide entity was the creation of Anton Cermak, a Bohemian immigrant who recognized that the era of fragmented, warring Irish ward bosses was unsustainable in a rapidly growing, multi-ethnic metropolis.

 Elected in 1931, Cermak interrupted the Irish stranglehold on local politics by inviting other ethnic groups—Poles, Germans, Czechs, and Jews—into his “house for all peoples”. Cermak’s genius lay in his ability to centralize political patronage and electoral nominating power, effectively creating a Chicago version of New York’s Tammany Hall that would eventually outperform its predecessor.

Cermak’s tenure was cut short in 1933 when he was killed by an assassin’s bullet in Miami—a bullet likely intended for President-elect Franklin D. Roosevelt. Following his death, the Irish contingent regained control as party chairman Patrick A. Nash engineered the appointment of Edward J. Kelly as mayor. The Kelly-Nash Machine refined Cermak’s model, capitalizing on several key sources of power to sustain the organization through the Great Depression and World War II.  First, Kelly became a fervent supporter of the New Deal, utilizing federal funds to create jobs and infrastructure that could be dispensed as patronage. Second, he maintained the “grease” of the Machine by ignoring the operations of gambling, prostitution, and other vice rackets, which provided the illegal funds necessary for political operations. Third, Kelly actively cultivated the support of Chicago’s growing African American population, a move that would pay dividends for the Machine for decades to come.

By 1947, however, Kelly’s administration was beset by scandals in the public school system and a rising public outcry against the visibility of organized crime. Paradoxically, his greatest liability among the Democratic faithful was his uncompromising stance in favor of public housing and desegregated schools—positions that threatened the ethnic enclaves that formed the Machine’s base. The party leadership persuaded Kelly not to seek reelection, replacing him with Martin H. Kennelly, a civic-minded figurehead who served as a respectable “reform” face for the organization while the Machine’s inner workings were quietly managed by party regulars.

The Apogee of Power: Richard J. Daley

The Machine reached its historical peak under the leadership of Richard J. Daley, the South Side “party regular” who succeeded Kennelly in 1955. Born and raised in Bridgeport, a neighborhood that produced five Chicago mayors, Daley was educated at the De La Salle Institute, where he absorbed the values of communal loyalty and hierarchy that would define his mayoralty.

Daley simultaneously held the positions of Mayor of Chicago and Chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party, a dual role that allowed him to single-handedly dominate the city’s political landscape until his death in 1976.

Daley’s Machine was a marvel of political engineering.

At its height, he controlled an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 patronage jobs. He famously circumvented civil service regulations by repeatedly hiring loyal Democrats to “temporary” positions that were exempt from competitive exams; as government workers retired or died, these roles were filled with party faithful in a cycle that ensured total dependence on the mayor’s favor.

This “patronage army” was the backbone of Daley’s power, capable of delivering one million votes through a network of precinct captains whose primary duty was to provide services to their neighbors in exchange for their support at the polls.

Under Daley, Chicago became known as “the city that works”. His administration oversaw the construction of O’Hare International Airport, the Sears Tower, and McCormick Place, as well as the expansion of the highway system—projects that solidified alliances with the downtown business community and the construction trade unions.

However, this efficiency came at a social cost. Daley was a staunch defender of residential segregation and a fierce opponent of the civil rights and Black Power movements. His refusal to embrace integration eventually alienated the Black voters who had been a mainstay of the Kelly-Nash era, leading to a decline in Machine support that would ultimately set the stage for the reforms of the 1980s.

I have been following the Machine for the last 50 years.

The Institutional Hierarchy: The Church and the Machine

Historians have noted that the structural organization of the Chicago Machine was a direct reflection of the Catholic Church’s hierarchy.

This institutional symbiosis was rooted in the common cultural experience of the Irish-Catholic leadership.

The mayor and party chair functioned as “Popes,” wielding absolute authority over the faithful. The aldermen and ward bosses were the “Bishops,” managing their respective “dioceses” of ward organizations, while the precinct captains served as the “Priests” who interacted directly with the parishioners/voters.

Daley’s personal life reinforced this connection; he was a daily communicant at Mass and viewed his service to the party and the city as an extension of his religious duty to protect the traditional community. This worldview prioritized stability and routine, viewing change—whether in the form of racial integration or political reform—as a threat to the established order.

As the Catholic Church underwent the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s, the “blind obedience” that sustained both the parish and the precinct began to erode. Nuns joined demonstrations against the Machine-appointed school superintendent, and parents began moving to the suburbs, reducing the central city’s voting influence and signaling the beginning of the end for the old-style Machine.

The 1968 Democratic National Convention: The “Massacre” on Michigan Avenue

The most significant rupture in the Machine’s national reputation occurred during the 1968 Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago. Held against a backdrop of deep national division over the Vietnam War and the recent assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, the convention was supposed to demonstrate Daley’s ability to maintain “law and order”.

Instead, it became the site of what the Walker Report later termed a “police riot”.

Nearly 12,000 Chicago police officers, 6,000 members of the Illinois National Guard, and 6,000 federal troops were deployed to suppress anti-war protesters, including the Youth International Party (Yippies) led by Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin.

The city had refused to grant march permits, and Daley had previously ordered his police to “shoot to kill arsonists and shoot to maim looters” during the unrest following King’s murder. This atmosphere of aggression culminated on the evening of August 28, 1968, in front of the Conrad Hilton Hotel. As television cameras broadcast live, police used tear gas and billy clubs on protesters, bystanders, journalists, and even delegates.

The “massacre” of political norms was equally visible inside the convention hall. Senator Abraham Ribicoff, in his nominating speech for George McGovern, denounced the “Gestapo tactics on the streets of Chicago”.  Cameras captured Daley and the Illinois delegation angrily jeering Ribicoff, a moment that became an iconic image of the Machine’s confrontational and increasingly out-of-step political style.

While the convention was not paralyzed and no lives were lost, the fallout was catastrophic for the Democratic Party and the Machine. The event led to wholesale changes in the party’s delegate selection process, reducing the power of urban bosses like Daley to hand-pick presidential candidates and highlighting the deep cultural divide between the Machine and the New Left.

Chronology of the 1968 DNC Unrest

DateEventOutcome/Significance
August 22Shooting of 17-year-old Dean Johnson by police.Sparked initial Yippie and SDS protests.
August 23Attempted nomination of Pigasus the Pig for President.Rubin, Ochs, and others arrested; heightened tensions.
August 26Police physical ejection of Yippies from Lincoln Park.First major violent clash after curfew violation.
August 28“The Police Riot” at the Conrad Hilton.National broadcast of violence; “The whole world is watching.”
August 29Denunciation by Ribicoff in convention hall.Formal political rupture between Machine and anti-war wing.

Bilandic, Byrne, and the 1979 Blizzard

I arrived into the Chicago scene in 1976.
I remember like yesterday the shock of Richard J. Daley’s sudden death in December 1976 that left a massive vacuum in Chicago’s power structure.

To succeed him, the party chose Michael A. Bilandic, a “colorless party functionary” from Bridgeport. Bilandic’s tenure was characterized by an attempt to maintain the Daley status quo, but he lacked the patriarch’s charisma and political instinct. His downfall was precipitated by the Great Blizzard of 1979.  Bilandic’s inept handling of the record-setting snowstorm—specifically the failure to clear streets and the city’s inability to deliver basic services—led Chicagoans to question the Machine’s fundamental promise that it could “make the city work”.

This failure allowed Jane Byrne, a former Daley protégé who had been fired by Bilandic, to run a maverick campaign for mayor. Byrne won the 1979 Democratic primary in a colossal upset, becoming the city’s first female mayor. While her victory was seen as a blow to the Machine, her subsequent four-year term was marked by erratic leadership and shifting alliances.

Byrne initially stripped powerful aldermen like Ed Vrdolyak of their committee roles, only to later ally with them when her own political standing weakened. This instability created the opening for the most significant challenge to the Machine’s racial and political order: the 1983 election of Harold Washington.

The Harold Washington Rebellion and the Council Wars

Harold Washington’s rise to the mayoralty was the culmination of decades of Black political aspiration in Chicago. A veteran of the Machine who had served as a precinct captain and state legislator, Washington eventually broke with the organization to run as an independent reformer. His 1983 campaign was built on a multiracial coalition of Black, Hispanic, and progressive white voters—groups that had historically been marginalized or treated as secondary by the Daley-era Machine.

Washington’s victory in the three-way Democratic primary against incumbent Jane Byrne and Richard M. Daley (the son of the late boss) sent shockwaves through the city’s white political establishment. The general election, where many high-ranking Democrats supported the Republican candidate Bernard Epton under the racially charged slogan “Before It’s Too Late,” was surprisingly close, but Washington prevailed.

Once in office, Washington faced an unprecedented stalemate known as the “Council Wars”. A group of 29 aldermen, mostly white regulars led by Edward “Fast Eddie” Vrdolyak and Edward M. Burke, formed a solid bloc to oppose the mayor at every turn. This “Vrdolyak 29” used their majority to vote down Washington’s appointments and legislative proposals, while Washington used his veto power to block the council’s measures. The conflict paralyzed city government for three years, with Chicago being mockingly labeled “Beirut by the Lake”.

The Council Wars only ended in 1986, following a federal court-ordered redistricting that remapped seven wards to more accurately reflect Chicago’s Black and Hispanic population growths. Special elections in these wards gave Washington a 25-25 split in the council, allowing him to use his tie-breaking vote as mayor to finally push through his appointments and budget.

Washington’s 1987 reelection confirmed his mandate, but he died of a sudden heart attack just months into his second term, once again plunging the city into a leadership crisis.

The “Three Eddies”: The Face of the Opposition

FigureRoleKey TacticsUltimate Fate
Edward Vrdolyak10th Ward Alderman; Party Chair.Leader of “The 29”; used “Fast Eddie” deal-making to block Washington.Joined GOP; later convicted of tax evasion and bribery.
Edward M. Burke14th Ward Alderman; Finance Chair.Controlled city’s “purse strings”; key architect of legislative gridlock.Convicted in 2023 on 13 counts of racketeering and bribery.
Edmund KellyPark District Superintendent.First Democrat to endorse Washington’s GOP opponent; used Park District for patronage.Ousted by Washington; political clout vanished.

Evolution of A Dynasty: Richard M. Daley and the New Machine

The election of Richard M. Daley in 1989 (in a special election following the death of Washington and the interim mayoralty of Eugene Sawyer) signaled the return of the Daley family to power, but in a significantly different guise.  Richard M. Daley, known as “Richie,” understood that the demographics of the city and the legal landscape of patronage had changed irrevocably. The Shakman decrees, which had been finalized in the early 1980s, severely curtailed the ability of the mayor to use city jobs as political rewards.

Consequently, Richard M. Daley built what political scientists called the “New Machine” or the “Synthetic Machine”.

The new Machine version was powered by massive campaign contributions from the global economy and the downtown business elite.

These funds were used to hire professional political consultants, (e.g. David Axelrod), conduct public opinion polls, and purchase expensive television advertising—substituting retail patronage for wholesale media influence.

Construction interests became a cornerstone of this new regime.  By 1999, the construction industry provided nearly 17% of Daley’s total revenue, with trade unions supplying over $100,000 in support.

Richard M. Daley’s mayoralty (1989-2011) lasted 22 years—one year longer than his father’s.

Daley’s tenure was marked by a shift in political strategy: he successfully co-opted the LGBTQ+ community, becoming the first Chicago mayor to march in the Pride Parade and appointing the first openly gay alderperson. He also expanded the Machine’s alliance to include a broader segment of the Latino community.  

The New Daley Dynasty remained a family business. His brother William Daley served as U.S. Secretary of Commerce and White House Chief of Staff; his brother John was a powerful Cook County Commissioner and ward committeeman; and his nephew, Patrick Daley Thompson, served as an alderman before his own conviction for bank fraud.

The Syndicate Connection: The Outfit and the First Ward

Throughout its history, the Chicago Democratic Machine maintained a dark, symbiotic relationship with the Chicago Outfit—the city’s primary Mafia syndicate.

This connection was most visible in the First Ward, which encompassed the high-value real estate of the Loop. The Outfit’s presence in Chicago politics predated the Democratic Machine, with Al Capone famously donating $200,000 to the 1928 campaign of Republican Mayor “Big Bill” Thompson and using his gangsters to terrorize polling places during the “Pineapple Primary”.

By the mid-twentieth century, however, the Outfit’s political influence had migrated to the Democratic Party.

The First Ward became a fiefdom managed by figures who took direct orders from the mob.

The key figure in this nexus was Pat Marcy (born Pasqualino Marciano), a former Capone gunman who served as the Secretary of the First Ward Democratic Organization. Marcy was described by the FBI as a “made man” in the Outfit who used his political position to fix trials, secure job appointments in law enforcement, and coordinate bribes. He regularly met with the mob’s main enforcers at Counselors Row restaurant, strategically located across from City Hall, to ensure that the Machine’s interests and the Outfit’s interests remained aligned.

The Outfit utilized the Machine’s patronage system to place its associates on the public payroll. For example, Christopher “Christy the Nose” Spina, a capo of the Grand Avenue crew and a driver for Joey Lombardo, worked for years for Chicago’s Bureau of Signs and Markings. This “West Side Bloc,” a newspaper euphemism for the mob’s political influence, consistently opposed anti-crime legislation in Springfield and ensured that the Outfit’s gambling and vice operations remained unmolested.

There is more to be told about the West Side Bloc.  Say, about Tony Accardo, a resident of River Forest.  (Hey, we know more than that…).

The relationship only collapsed in the early 1990s through “Operation Gambat,” an investigation sparked by lawyer-turned-mole Robert Cooley, which led to the conviction of Alderman Fred Roti and the eventual mapping of the First Ward out of existence.

The Outfit’s Political Liaison: The First Ward Hierarchy

PositionIndividualNature of Connection
The SecretaryPat MarcyFormer Capone gunman; FBI-identified “made man” who fixed trials and coordinated bribes.
The AldermanFred RotiConvicted of RICO conspiracy and fixing murder cases for the Outfit.
The CommitteemanJohn D’Arco Sr.Identified by FBI as a high-ranking made member/capo in the mob.
The BagmanJake “Greasy Thumb” GuzikAccountant for Capone; specialized in bribing public officials.

The Legislative Fortress: Michael Madigan and His Springfield Machine

While the Daley family dominated the executive branch, a legislative machine of perhaps even greater endurance was built by Michael Madigan. Serving as the Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives for all but two years between 1983 and 2021, Madigan became the longest-serving legislative leader in American history.

His power was rooted in the 13th Ward on Chicago’s Southwest Side, an organization that functioned as a highly disciplined “political crime syndicate,” according to his critics.

Madigan’s power, often referred to as the “Velvet Hammer,” was maintained through a system of backroom deals, patronage, and absolute control over the legislative process. As Speaker, he possessed the sole discretion to decide which bills would be called for a vote, allowing him to kill legislation supported by the public or use it as leverage in negotiations. He also doled out committee chair positions and their associated $10,000 stipends as rewards for loyalty.

His influence was multi-dimensional: as Chairman of the Illinois Democratic Party, he decided which candidates received resources; as a private attorney, he ran a law firm specializing in property tax appeals that served many clients doing business with the state.

The Madigan dynasty also extended to his family. He adopted his stepdaughter, Lisa Madigan, who became the first female Attorney General of Illinois and served for 16 years (2003-2019). His wife, Shirley, chaired the Illinois Arts Council for nearly four decades. Madigan’s reign finally collapsed in 2021 following a federal investigation into a years-long bribery scheme with the utility giant Commonwealth Edison (ComEd), in which the company provided jobs and contracts for Madigan’s associates in exchange for favorable legislation. In 2025, Madigan was convicted on ten felony counts, including racketeering and wire fraud, and sentenced to 7.5 years in federal prison.

The Nepotism of Corruption: Rod Blagojevich and the Mell Legacy

The career of Rod Blagojevich represents the final, decadent stage of Machine politics, where nepotism and personal ambition overrode the discipline of the organization. Blagojevich, a “nobody lawyer” from the state’s attorney’s office, rose to power through his marriage to Patricia Mell, the daughter of the powerful 33rd Ward Alderman Richard Mell.  Mell, who oversaw an “army of patronage workers,” essentially hand-picked Blagojevich for the state legislature, pushed him into Congress, and finally bankrolled his run for governor in 2002.

The relationship between the “Governor-in-law” and his father-in-law quickly devolved into a public feud. Blagojevich sought to build his own independent political machine, shaking down campaign contributions from state contractors to reduce his reliance on Mell’s ward organization. This led to a dramatic break in 2005 when Blagojevich shut down a landfill owned by a Mell relative, leading Mell to publicly accuse his son-in-law’s chief fundraiser of trading state jobs for contributions.

Blagojevich’s downfall culminated in 2008 when he was arrested for attempting to “sell” the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama. He was convicted on 17 counts, including wire fraud and attempted extortion, and sentenced to 14 years in prison. While his sentence was later commuted by Donald Trump in 2020, Blagojevich’s legacy remains a case study in the collapse of the traditional Machine’s internal hierarchy into individualized corruption.

The Final Lords of the Machine: Edward Burke and the End of an Era

The conviction of Edward M. Burke in 2023 served as the definitive “end of watch” for the old-school Chicago Machine. Burke, who succeeded his father, Joseph P. Burke, as the 14th Ward Alderman in 1969, was the longest-serving member of the City Council in Chicago history.

For decades, as Chairman of the Finance Committee, Burke was considered the most powerful man in city government after the mayor, controlling the city’s budget, municipal bonds, and the selection of judges.

Burke’s power was a relic of the Daley era, sustained through his control of the Southwest Side Irish organization and his private law practice, Klafter & Burke, which specialized in property tax appeals for high-profile clients, including Donald Trump. He was a “master parliamentarian” and a political historian who nevertheless became entangled in a federal shakedown scheme involving a local Burger King. Burke’s conviction on 13 counts of racketeering and bribery—at the age of 80—symbolized the final erosion of the “Three Eddies” era.

The New Hegemony: From Patronage to Union Organizing

As the traditional Machine of the Daleys, Madigans, and Burkes has been dismantled by federal prosecutors and legal reforms, a new political force has emerged to take its place: the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU).

This transition represents the ultimate irony of Chicago history: the “radical” community organizing methods of Saul Alinsky have been synthesized with the organizational discipline of labor unions to create a “New Machine”.

The election of Brandon Johnson in 2023 was the definitive proof of this shift. Johnson, a former CTU organizer, was propelled into City Hall by an organization that has funneled millions into political campaigns and currently funds 30 of the 50 aldermen.

While the old Machine relied on the mayor’s control over the unions, the current era is defined by the unions’ control over the mayor. This “labor-anchored” movement focuses on progressive policy goals rather than individual patronage jobs, yet it maintains a hierarchical structure and an aggressive electoral strategy that is undeniably “Chicago-style”.

David Axelrod – Superconnector, Advisor and Envoy

In a different review I examined the intersection of “Machine” logistics and “Messianism” in the career of David Axelrod.

Axelrod is a democratic machine to itself. 

To understand Axelrod is to understand the evolution of the Chicago Democrat Machine from a collection of ward-level patronage silos into a sophisticated, modern,media-driven global apparatus.

Axelrod’s career represents the “Gentle Machine”—the transition from the heavy-handed tactics of the old guard (think Richard J. Daley) to the aspirational, narrative-focused politics that vaulted Barack Obama to the world stage.

A man with a mustache wearing a suit and tie, looking thoughtfully to the side in an indoor setting with decorative curtains and a framed artwork on the wall.
(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The Architect of the New Machine

Axelrod’s relationship with the Chicago Democratic Machine is complex. He is a former journalist (Chicago Tribune), fundamentally a political strategist, who managed to master the Machine’s mechanics to dismantle it and then rebuild it.

The Multi-Ethnic Coalition

Axelrod’s sophistication lay in his ability to bridge the gap between the white ethnic power bases and the emerging Black political power in Chicago (think Rev. Jesse Jackson). By working for Harold Washington (the city’s first Black mayor) and Richard M. Daley (the scion of the Machine), Axelrod essentially created a “Unified Field Theory” of Chicago politics.

Tactical Shift: He replaced the “precinct captain” model with the “narrative model,” realizing that in a digital age and mainstream media – is a compelling story more efficient than a city job for winning votes.

The Agent of Global Outreach

By 2026, Axelrod has moved beyond the borders of Cook County.  His role as the “Senior Envoy” for the Obama organization and legacy has turned the old Chicago “get out the vote” mentality into a form of high-level international diplomacy.

The April 2026 Vatican Mission: Axelrod and Leo XIV

The visit on April 9, 2026 to Pope Leo XIV serves as a fascinating case study in what we call “Ecclesiastical Geopolitics.”

The “Windy City” Connection: The optics of this meeting is singular. Pope Leo XIV, an American citizen with deep Chicago south-side roots, has been dubbed the “Windy City Pope.”

Axelrod’s audience at the Vatican was a calculated diplomatic gesture.

The Obama Mandate: Operating as an envoy for Barack Obama, Axelrod’s mission reportedly focused on aligning the Vatican’s “Civilization of Love” framework with the Obama Foundation’s global initiatives.

The Narrative Strategy: Much like the 2008 campaign, the goal was to frame contemporary global conflicts (specifically the tensions in the Middle East) through a lens of “Hope and Peace,” a classic Axelrod trope.

The Political Friction: Predictably, the visit drew sharp criticism from the White House, with Donald Trump dismissing the meeting as a “Loser from the Left” meeting a “Weak” Pope.  From a political science perspective, this clash underscores the widening rift between traditional diplomatic norms and the new populist political rhetoric.

In the final analysis, David Axelrod has not left the Chicago Democratic Machine; he has simply expanded its jurisdiction. Whether he is negotiating a mayoral race in the 19th Ward or advising the Pontiff in the Apostolic Palace, Axelrod applies the same foundational principle:

The person who controls the story controls the power.

Side Note: I skipped mentioning Barrack Obama and Rham Emanuel with purpose. Their story is still evolving. Obama seeks new relevance in Chicago and Emanuel seeks the U.S. Presidency…. Let’s see what the near future will bring.

SUBSCRIBE to this blog. Its free.

The history of the Chicago Democratic Machine is a story of metamorphosis. From the ethnic enclaves of the 1930s to the corporate-funded regime of the 1990s and the union-backed radicalism of the 2020s, the impulse to centralize power and organize the city’s disparate interests remains the defining feature of Chicago politics. The “levy” that Cermak built and Daley perfected has been breached by reform, but the political waters of the Second City continue to flow through the channels of disciplined, hierarchical organizations.

Historical Overview of Chicago Political Families

FamilyPrimary BaseKey FiguresNotable RolesStatus
Daley11th Ward (Bridgeport).Richard J., Richard M., William, John.Mayors, Cabinet Sec., Committeemen.Influence waned after Richard M. retired; Patrick D. convicted.
Madigan13th Ward.Michael J., Lisa, Shirley.House Speaker, Attorney General, Party Chair.Empire collapsed after 2021; Michael J. convicted in 2025.
Burke14th Ward.Joseph, Edward M., Anne, Dan.Finance Chair, Supreme Court Justice, State Rep.Edward M. convicted in 2023; 50-year tenure ended.
Mell33rd Ward.Richard, Rod Blagojevich (son-in-law), Deb.Alderman, Governor, State Rep.Richard retired; Blagojevich convicted/commuted; Deb defeated.

The enduring nature of these dynasties suggests that Chicago politics is less about individual leaders and more about the “clout” and “payback” inherent in family-based political organizations.

While the federal courts and changing demographics have altered the mechanisms of power, the fundamental structure of the Chicago Democratic Machine—the fusion of personal loyalty, institutional hierarchy, and the ruthless pursuit of electoral victory—continues to shape the destiny of the city and the state of Illinois.

www.mandylender.com  www.mandylendernet.net www.attractome.com  www.visionofhabakkuk.com

Tags: #ChicagoDemocraticMachine #RichardDaley #MichaelMadigan #RodBlagojevich #ChicagoTeachersUnion #HaroldWashington #DavidAxelrod #EdVredolyak #RichardMell #AntonCermak #SaulAlinsky #ChicagoOutfit #politics #FirstWard

Posted in Business, Chicago Notebook, Mandy Lender, politics, Religion, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Understanding Ecclesiastical Geopolitics: Axelrod and the Vatican Connection

The Chicago Democrat Machine evolved from a patronage system to a modern political structure under David Axelrod, who bridged diverse power bases and expanded its influence globally, while framing narratives to control power. I have been following it for 50 years.

The Machine represents a sophisticated and resilient urban political organization in American history. Established by Anton Cermak and perfected by Richard J. Daley, it functioned as a secular hierarchy modeled after the Catholic Church—a system where patronage jobs were the “sacraments” and absolute loyalty was the primary mandate.

At its peak, the Machine controlled a vast “patronage army,” ensuring the city functioned while maintaining rigid social orders and clandestine alliances with the Chicago Outfit, most notably within the mob-controlled First Ward.

The Chicago Machine’s history is defined by moments of extreme tension: the 1968 “police riot” at the Democratic National Convention, the “Council Wars” led by the “Three Eddies,” and the “synthetic” corporate-funded era of Richard M. Daley. The recent decade has seen a definitive “end of watch” for the old guard, as federal racketeering convictions dismantled the empires of Michael Madigan and Edward Burke.

Ultimately, the Machine has not disappeared but morphed.

The traditional patronage-based “clout” of the Daley era has been replaced by the organizational discipline of the Chicago Teachers Union. This transition represents a historical irony: the radical community organizing tactics of Saul Alinsky have been synthesized into a new, labor-anchored political hegemony.

David Axelrod – Superconnector, Consultant and Envoy

In a prior review I examined the intersection of “Machine” logistics and “Messianism” in the career of David Axelrod.

A man with dark hair and a mustache wearing a suit and tie, looking thoughtfully to the side in an indoor setting with natural light.

Photo: White House

Axelrod is a democrat machine to itself.

To understand Axelrod is to understand the evolution of the Chicago Democrat Machine from a collection of ward-level patronage silos into a sophisticated, modern, media-driven global apparatus.

Axelrod’s career represents the “Gentle Machine”—the transition from the heavy-handed tactics of the old guard (think Richard J. Daley) to the aspirational, narrative-focused politics that vaulted Barack Obama to the world stage.

The Architect of the New Machine

Axelrod’s relationship with the Chicago Democrat Machine is complex. He is a former journalist (The Chicago Tribune), fundamentally a political strategist, who managed to master the Machine’s mechanics – to dismantle and then rebuild it.

The Multi-Ethnic Coalition

Axelrod’s skills lay in his ability to bridge the gap between the white ethnic power bases and the emerging Black political power in Chicago (think Rev. Jesse Jackson). By working for Harold Washington (the city’s first Black mayor) and Richard M. Daley (the scion of the Machine), Axelrod essentially created a “Unified Field Theory” of Chicago politics.

Tactical Shift: He replaced the “precinct captain” model with the “narrative model,” realizing that in a digital age and mainstream media – is a compelling story  more efficient than a city job for winning votes.

The Agent of Global Outreach

By 2026, Axelrod has moved beyond the borders of Cook County.  His role as the “Senior Envoy” for the Obama organization and legacy has turned the old Chicago “get out the vote” mentality into a form of high-level international diplomacy.

The April 2026 Vatican Mission: Axelrod and Leo XIV

The visit on April 9, 2026 to Pope Leo XIV serves as a fascinating case study in what we call “Ecclesiastical Geopolitics.”

The “Windy City” Connection: The optics of this meeting is singular.  Pope Leo XIV, an American citizen with deep Chicago south-side roots, has been dubbed the “Windy City Pope.”

Axelrod’s audience at the Vatican was a calculated diplomatic gesture.

The Obama Mandate: Operating as an envoy for Barack Obama, Axelrod’s mission reportedly focused on aligning the Vatican’s “Civilization of Love” framework with the Obama Foundation’s global initiatives.

The Narrative Strategy: Much like the 2008 campaign, the goal was to frame contemporary global conflicts (specifically the tensions in the Middle East) through a lens of “Hope and Peace,” a classic Axelrod trope.

The Political Friction: Predictably, the visit drew sharp criticism from the White House, with Donald Trump dismissing the meeting as a “Loser from the Left” meeting a “Weak” Pope.  From a political science perspective, this clash underscores the widening rift between traditional diplomatic norms and the new populist political rhetoric.

SUBSCRIBE to this Blog. Its Free.

In the final analysis, David Axelrod has not left the Chicago Democrat Machine; he has simply expanded its jurisdiction. Whether he is negotiating a mayoral race in the 19th Ward or advising the Pontiff in the Apostolic Palace, Axelrod applies the same foundational principle:

The person who controls the story controls the power.

www.mandylender.com www.mandylender.net   www.attractome.com

Tags: #DavidAxelrod #LeoXIV #ecclesiasticalgeopolitics #BarrackObama #DonaldTrump #ChicagoDemocratMachine #RichardJDaley #DNC1968 #WindyCity #SaulAlinsky

Posted in Chicago Notebook, Mandy Lender, politics, Religion, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Global Serendipitome

Global Serendipitome – Introductory Notes and Role of Sociality, Adventurism and Sagacity

This paper delves into and expands the Global Serendipitome framework. The paper emphasizes Sociality, Adventurism, and Sagacity as essential for engineering serendipity. It transforms static connections into dynamic encounters through intentional interactions and algorithmic approaches, enhancing collective wisdom.

Stated otherwise – the Serendipitome henceforth is globalized and available to anyone.

It is a sequel to our preceding paper that first introduced the framework of the Serendipitome.  That prior paper predicated the required existence of Sociality, Adventurism, and Sagacity for engineering serendipity encounters. In this present paper we go into the adept human skills of Sociality in the milieu of large crowds; into personal geographic Adventurism of global dimensions; and discuss the mental state of the collective Sagacity.

The concept of a serendipitor person who is a manifestor of “Engineered Serendipity” events is practiced by some fortunate (“lucky”) ordinary folks, who represent a shift from the passive observer status to the active catalyst of sparking random serendipitous encounters.

When you apply this shift to our earlier published concept of the Serendipitome, you are essentially moving from a map of “potential connections” to a kinetic high-energy environment.  Here, the connections are forced into existence as empiric events of Newtonian reality.  In other words certain high energy potential contacts can be forced into serendipitous outcomes.

We also introduce the added model of engineered intentional friction.

By inserting kinetic intentional friction into the Serendipitome framework, this “engineering” method acts as a prism, refracting ordinary events into serendipitous discoveries of physical phenomena.

Let me further explain.

1. Engineered Interaction: The Catalyst of Direct Action

In the past traditional random manifestors often hung-on to a random “serendipitous” external trigger.  These may have been, a phone call, a whistleblower, a salesperson, a guru, a sense of gut feeling (buy a lottery-winning ticket), attend a random event at the SXSW, a trade convention, or getting excited in the Coachella.   

That is now changed. In contrast, we propose that Engineered Kinetic Interaction creates a new energized synthetic crossroads.

By kinetically entering a novel energized environment, or a different vibrating space, and demanding a response, the manifestor, or entrepreneur forces a collision between their private reality and public scrutiny.

This is huge.

  • Elevating the Serendipitome: The Serendipitome is now transformed from a static framework into an energy charged kinetic field.  In this framework, random serendipity encounter is no longer a random arrival.

A serendipity encounter is the inevitable energy spark having been generated by the friction of two opposing forces.  

Consequently, we aren’t waiting for the truth to emerge. Rather, we are energetically engineering the environment, so the truth has no other choice but to collide with us.

2. Algorithmic Engineering: Mathematical Predicted Serendipity

Social media algorithms are, by definition, engineered ecosystems of discovery. When a creator (like Nick Shirley or Drew Binski) uses “Algorithmic Engineering,” they align their output with a higher statistical likelihood of internet virality.  Same is said about the act of querying a search engine. Same is now the new wave of creative prompting (“engineering of prompts”) of LLMs, resulting in a new reality as presented by the LLM agent report.

This is engineered serendipity at scale. 

And this is huge.

  • Elevating the Serendipitome:  here we introduce the use of Statistical Density. When you expose yourself to a “position of greater luck” (like Binski’s adventuring in 197 countries), you are increasing the surface area of the Global Serendipitome. By understanding the “hooks” that trigger the algorithm, you are essentially “salting the mine” of the digital landscape, ensuring that your message hits (“encounters”) the right people at the right time on viral dimensions. In other words, kinetic serendipity engineering is scaled by using statistical methods. Thus, the field of statistics is part of the Global Serendipitome for both the sender and receiver.

3. Independent Crowdsourcing: The Decentralized Serendipitome

The Organic Start of Virality.

Traditional media newsrooms or the WH pressroom act as gatekeepers—they are the “bottlenecks” of serendipity. By bypassing these chock points and going directly to the field, “Serendipity Media Engineers” (podcasters, syndicated bloggers like us), leverage the collective eyes and ears of the community.  That is the organic start of internet global virality. From that point on reality takes new unrestricted and unpredictable shapes and forms.

We employ the form of Independent Random Crowdsourcing.

  • The Elevation of The Serendipitome: That is where the shift of the Serendipitome from the personal map to a distributed network takes place. When the “crowd” funds, contributes, votes, or validates the narrative, the serendipitous events are no longer limited to what is one person perception.

Instead, we create a “Guerrilla Serendipity Network” where thousands of people who act as sensors, are feeding “serendipitous” breaking news into the receiving central node.  Public opinion as is shaped by promotional market influencers are actually tools of the Global Serendipitome.

Our own syndicated blogging employs the multiplier effects of search engines’ “crawler” practices into multiple websites. 

When our blog in the Chinese or Spanish languages version is posted (in language other than English), it is globalized. It is likely to be serendipitously encountered by internet surfers anywhere from China to Chile.

In other words intellectual crowd sourcing amplifies the Global Serendipitome.

Thus, intellectual crowd sourcing is part of the Global Serendipitome.

4. Geographic Adventurism: Expanding the Horizon

The “peripatetic” nature of Drew Binski’s international exploration work highlights the importance of  Geographic and Social Adventurism. To encounter truly random events, a serendipitor must leave the “home” coordinates of their personal Serendipitome.  The renowned novelist James Michener did just that – he moved from one continent to another and in his life time he authored over twelve different, locale-inspired, bestselling historical novels that made him rich and famous (starting with the Tales of the South Pacific). So did Paul Theroux with his Great Railway Bazaar.

  • Elevating the Serendipitome:  Adventure seeking exploratory travel represents the Expansion Phase into Global Serendipity. You cannot engineer serendipity if you stay in a closed loop.

By traveling to the “fringes” (geographic locales or distant social communities), we encounter “black swans” – people or events – who are extreme outliers that would never happen to us in a controlled, legacy environment. This territorial breakout elevates our worldview experience into the Global Serendipitome level, where the connections are no longer local, but universal. This discussion of the value of Adventurism pertains to the other various kinetic implications mentioned above.

Aerial view of rocky mountain cliffs covered in snow with a red airplane wing in the foreground.

The author is facing the granite wall of Mount McKinley AK. From a bush pilot plane.

Comparison of Serendipity Engineering Methodologies

MethodTraditional Approach“Engineered” ApproachImpact on the Serendipitome
InteractionReactive (Waiting for leaks)Proactive (Triggering responses)Kinetic: Forces “random” events through friction.
ScaleEditorial GatekeepingAlgorithmic ViralityStatistical: Maximizes “random events ” surface area.
ValidationInstitutional AuthorityCommunity CrowdsourcingDistributed: Leverages a decentralized networks.
MovementStatic (Bureau-based)Adventurous (Peripatetic) discoveries.Expansive: Introduces high-impact outliers.

SUBSCRIBE to this blog. It’s free.

By treating humans not just as observers, but as Engineers of Random Events Chance, you elevate the Serendipitome to a higher tier – from a philosophical concept into a practical work tool for discoveries in the global Newtonian reality.

5. Sagacity: The Third Predicate of the Serendipitome.

Sagacity is the individual quality of the person who is discerning, sound-in- judgment, and a farsighted human.  It is the elusive talent of “connecting the dots.”  The neuropsychological characteristics of being discerning, sound-in-judgment, and farsighted are rooted in the mind’s high-level executive functioning, emotional regulation, and advanced neurocognitive integration.  Sagacity is a “virtuosity” or sovereignty over the materials and processes of production. It is the ability to “see what others don’t” and to act on its potential when encountered.  This is not a matter of luck but the result of patiently acquired skill and expertise.

  • Elevating The Global Serendipitome: Collective Sagacity

The concept of the “global serendipitome” extends the principles of individual sagacity to the level of social systems and collective social intelligence. In this context, sagacity is no longer just a personal trait but a property of the “sagacious context” and the inter-relations between individuals.

Collective Sagacity and Social Capital

Collective sagacity refers to the ability of a community to harness the “wisdom of the crowd” while avoiding the “madness of the crowd”. It is achieved through “synergistic partnerships” and community engagement, allowing for a shared sense of ownership in cognitive developmental paradigms.

Stated otherwise, we aren’t just mapping the world:

Global Serendipity is the machinery that forces the world to reveal itself to us.

www.mandylender.com www.mandylender.net  www.attractome.com www.lendercombinations.com

© Mandy Lender 2026. All rights reserved.

Tags: #serendipity #globalserendipitome #intentionalfriction #forcedcollision #algorithmicvirality #kineticserendipityengineering #technology #grok #gemini  #deepseek

Posted in Creativity, existentialism, Law of Attraction, Mandy Lender - Author, Mind - Body, serendipity, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Marcus Aurelius Comment on Strategic Resource Allocation

I know.

I know. The title of this article is brow-raising and will deter some readers.
But. “Hey,” such is life. Life is not about a walk in the park or only eating peaches.

“You have the power over your mind – not outside events.  Realize this, and you will have strength.”

Marcus Aurelius’ (121-180 AD) meditation serves as a foundational pillar for both classical Stoicism and modern Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. At its core, this quote addresses the Locus of Control—the psychological boundary between what an individual can influence and what they must accept.

Now then, “Gird up the loins of your mind”, said Peter (1 Peter 1:13).  It’s not easy.

The Shift from “Hand Wringing” to Action

The transition from a state of anxiety (hand wringing) to “resolute action” requires a fundamental reclassification of life’s data points. Aurelius argued that suffering doesn’t stem from events themselves, but from the judgment we place upon them.

External Events (The Indifferents): These include the economy, the weather, other people’s opinions, and past mistakes. Worrying about these is an exercise in futility because they are objectively outside your jurisdiction.

The Internal Mind (The Hegemonikon): This is your “commanding faculty.” Our own perspective, our intentions, and our immediate responses.

By withdrawing emotional investment from the “outside,”  we conserve the mental energy required to act within our own sphere of influence.

This isn’t passivity; it is strategic resource allocation.

From the lens of the Serendipitome, there is a certain “common sense” magic to it. When you spend your day fretting over a storm, you’re looking at the clouds and missing the diamond on the sidewalk.

Aurelius suggests that “strength” comes from a clear mind. In the context of the Serendipitome, the mind that isn’t cluttered with “what ifs” and “why me’s”, is more attuned to spotting lucky breaks.  You can’t control when a door opens, but you have absolute power over whether you are standing ready to walk through it.

It’s about being “fixed in purpose” so that when the universe tosses a lemon our way, we aren’t just making lemonade—we’re already holding the sugar and the pitcher.

If you have a purpose you will go through any “how”.  That was a paraphrase on Nietzsche’s saying.  Then came Viktor Frankl – with Man Search For Meaning.

Here is a concise structured summation of this Aurelian idea.

AspectHand Wringing (Reactive)Resolute Action (Proactive)
Focus“Why is this happening to me?”“How do I respond to this?”
Energy DrainHigh (spent on the unchangeable)Productive (spent on the changeable)
PerspectiveVictim of circumstancesArchitect of character
OutcomeParalysis and fatigueProgress and resilience

The “Strength” of the Internal Fortress

The “strength” Aurelius mention is often called the Inner Citadel. It is the realization that while the world can take your property, your health, or your status, it cannot force you to think a certain way.

When we stop trying to “muscle” the world into a specific shape and instead focus on mastering our own reactions, we become remarkably difficult to rattle.

SUBSCRIBE To This Blog. Its Free.

That steadiness is the ultimate competitive advantage in both business and life.

A historical scene depicting a charismatic leader in a toga, addressing a large, attentive crowd from a marble platform, set against a landscape of ancient Roman architecture and rolling hills.

www.mandylender.com www.mandylender.net www.attractome.com www.themasterattractor.com

Tags: #MarcusAurelius #Meditations #serendipitome #innercitadel  #ViktorFrankl # friedrichnietzsche

Posted in Alternative Medicine, existentialism, Grokipedia, HEALTH AND WELLNESS, Law of Attraction, Mind - Body, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IN SEARCH OF LOST TIME

IN SEARCH OF LOST TIME: OUR SPARE TIME ISN’T SPARE – IT’S OPPORTUNITY TIME

“Spare Time” is a myth. It can lead to success, illustrated through stories of James Michener, Sylvester Stallone, Steve Jobs, and Sam Walton transforming opportunities into achievements.

Most people waste their spare moments.

Other people make fortunes in their spare time.

My friend says that every day is a fortune.  We both agreed that time is our only asset.

The famed American novelist James Michener began his writing career during World War II, – in his spare time – when as a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy he was assigned to the South Pacific ocean as a Naval historian.

He experienced many boring evening. And boring nights.

So he took notes. Notes of what he saw and whom he met.

After his discharge from service in the Navy he later turned his notes and impressions into Tales of the South Pacific – his first book – 1947.  It was published when he was age 40. The book later won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1948.  Rodgers and Hammerstein adapted it as the hit Broadway musical South Pacific.  

Michener went on to become a successful novelist with celebrity status and fortune. It started by him having not much more to do, other than taking notes in his spare time in the South Pacific islands.

Sylvester Stallone in 1970 was paid US$200 for two days’ work.   Stallone later explained that he lived a life of desperation after being evicted from his apartment and finding himself homeless for several days. In New York. He has also recounted how he slept three weeks in the Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City.   On March 24, 1975, Stallone saw the Muhammad Ali vs. Chuck Wepner fight. That night Stallone went home. There at home, having nothing better to do he wrote the script for Rocky. After three days he had completed the first draft of Rocky. He decided that the script he wrote fits him and he wanted to play the role of Rocky in this film.

Stallone attempted to sell the script to multiple studios, with the intention of playing the lead role himself. Irwin Winkler and Robert Chartoff became interested and offered Stallone US$350,000 for the rights, but they had their own casting ideas for the lead role.

Stallone refused to sell the script unless he played the lead character – and, eventually, after a substantial budget cut to compromise, it was agreed he could be the star.

Prior to seeing the casting notice for the film, in the actor’s words, “it was either do that movie or rob someone, because I was at the end – the very end – of my rope”.

Sylvester Stallone didn’t have spare time.  He had the time and he put it to use.

He put his time to use. Next he went to fame and fortune from this low point of his life.

SUBSCRIBE  To this blog  It’s free.

Steve Jobs had an Apple, an iPhone and a “Big” Mac.  At age 56 he passed. He left behind $11 billion.

Every day is a fortune as long as one is alive. Most people waste their spare moments.

A similar story for Sam Walton.  Used to be the richest man on the planet.  At age 74 he left behind Sam’s Club and Wal-Mart.  

Every day was a fortune for Sam Walton, as long as he lived.

My point is that there is no spare time in life.  Time is the only asset that a person has.

Every moment is a fortune.

As they say in French:

A la recherché du temps perdu. (~ Marcel Proust).

www.mandylender.com  www.mandylender.net  www.attractome.comwww.themasterattractor.com 

Tags: #SamWalton #SteveJobs #SylvesterStallone #JamesMichener #MarcelProust #RodgersandHammerstein #PulitzerPrize #TalesofSouthPacific #Rocky #Walmart #SamsClub

Posted in art, Business, Cancer, Creativity, existentialism, HEALTH AND WELLNESS, Mandy Lender - Author, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NOW THAT I CAME THIS FAR

Growth Mindset: Partnering for Excellence

I didn’t come this far just to come this far.  Now that I’m here, is the time to find the right partner that keeps pace with my goals – and helps take my vision to the next level.

“The horizon leans forward, offering you space to place new steps of change.”     

~ Maya Angelou

I did not endure the climb just to stand still. Having reached this altitude, I realize that this milestone is not my destination.   My viewpoint is to seek a partnership of equals—to find a kindred spirit who keeps pace with my ambition.

In the pursuit of excellence, “arriving” is an illusion. Every goal achieved is  a reward of better tools for the next challenge. When I say, “I didn’t come this far just to come this far,” I embraced the growth mindset. Remember: The reward for solving a difficult problem is usually the opportunity to solve a more meaningful one.

The right partner is a catalyst. I am looking for a partner who brings “productive friction” to our life. They shouldn’t just agree; they should expand our horizons until the vision is larger than what we have imagined alone.

SUBSCIBE to this blog. It’s free. Always will be.

www.mandylender.net www.mandylender.com www.attractome.com

Tags: #goals #growthmindset #partnership #MayaAngelou #achievement

Posted in Business, Creativity, existentialism, Law of Attraction, Mandy Lender - Author, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ANNUAL CANCER REPORT: A PATIENT’S NOTES

Hope and Progress: Reflecting on the 2026 American Cancer Society Report

A cancer diagnosis is a “before and after” moment. It is a life-altering experience that reshapes everything—from the smallest daily routines to our deepest perspectives on what matters. When you or a loved one receives that cruel news, the world feels different because it is different.

I know this journey personally. I am – Mandy Lender – a survivor of head and neck cancer, thanks to successful surgery. My sister, Minna Rozen is also a survivor.  She faced breast cancer with courage, underwent surgery and radiation therapy, and is now clear. However, I also know the weight of losing a loved one. My late wife fought colon cancer with everything she had, and despite the very best efforts of modern medicine, she passed away.

These experiences have taught me one undeniable truth:

Our health is our greatest wealth. It is the foundation for everything else we do.

Historic Milestone in 2026

While the fight against cancer remains difficult, the latest data from the American Cancer Society (ACS), released on January 13, 2026, offers us a reason for hope. For the first time we have reached a major milestone in oncology.

Key Takeaways from the 2026 Report

  • A New Survival Standard: For the first time, the five-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined has reached 70%. To put that in perspective, in the mid-1970s, that number was only 50%. Today, seven out of every ten people diagnosed with cancer will celebrate at least five more years of life—and many will go on to live decades more.

  • Progress in Difficult Areas: Medicine and Science are seeing remarkable gains in cancers that were once considered nearly untreatable:
    • Myeloma survival has doubled (from 32% to 62%).
    • Lung cancer survival has nearly doubled (from 15% to 28%).
    • Liver cancer survival has tripled (from 7% to 22%).

  • The Power of Early Detection: While survival rates are up, the number of new diagnoses is also rising. In 2026, an estimated 2.1 million Americans will be diagnosed with cancer. This increase—seen in breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers—reminds us that regular screenings and staying proactive about our health are more important than ever.
  • Rising Incidence: Despite declining death rates, the total number of new cancer cases continues to rise. In 2026, an estimated 2,114,850 new cancer diagnoses are expected in the U.S. (~5,800 per day). Incidence is increasing for 6 of the top 10 cancers, including breast, prostate, liver (women), melanoma (women), and pancreatic cancer.

  • Leading Cause of Death: An estimated 626,140 people are expected to die from cancer in 2026. Lung cancer remains the deadliest, projected to cause more deaths than colorectal and pancreatic cancers combined.

  • Colorectal Cancer Trends: Colorectal cancer continues to shift toward younger populations. It is now the leading cause of cancer death in men under age 50 and the second leading cause in women under 50.

  • Cancer Prevention: The ACS estimates that 40% of all newly diagnosed cancers in adults—about 850,000 cases—are potentially avoidable through lifestyle changes related to tobacco use, excess body weight, and alcohol consumption, as well as regular screening.

Five Most Common Cancers in the U.S. (2026 Estimates)

Based on the estimated number of new cases for 2026, the five most common cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) are:

  1. Prostate (Approx. 333,830 cases)
  2. Breast (Female) (Approx. 316,000–320,000 cases)
  3. Lung and Bronchus (Approx. 230,000 cases)
  4. Colon and Rectum (Approx. 158,850 cases)
  5. Melanoma of the Skin (Approx. 105,000 cases)

Looking Forward:

Despite these victories, the journey isn’t over. Lung cancer remains a significant challenge, causing more deaths than colorectal and pancreatic cancers combined. We acknowledge the 626,140 families who will face the loss of a loved one this year, and we let their stories fuel the urgency for continued research and better care.

The 2026 report tells a story of a world in transition. We are moving away from a time of fear and toward a time of manageable, treatable, and curable outcomes. As we celebrate the 70% survival milestone, let us hold onto hope and continue to cherish the wealth that is our health.

Subscribe

To this blog. It’s Free

You can find the full report here:

Cancer Facts & Figures 2026 (.pdf) :
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2026/2026-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf

www.mandylender.com www.mandylender.net www.attractome.com http://www.lendercombinations.com

Tags: #Cancer #cancercure, #AmericanCancerSociety #coloncancer # breastcancer

Posted in Cancer, Cancer Cure,, HEALTH AND WELLNESS, MEDICINE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment